Dilema Etik Dalam Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART)

  • Nurma Zela Gustina Universitas Indonesia
  • La Ode Abdul Rahman Universitas Indonesia
Keywords: assisted reproductive technology (ART); embryonic donors; ethics


The development of ART in the community that is important to do is related to ethics and dilemmas that may arise in the use of ART. The Improvement of ART user as solution in Infertility but also not able on rule of ART.  This study to provide an overview as well as an overview of the results of a literature review related to ethical dilemmas in actions assisted by reproductive technology. In this study using the literature review method. In ART actions related to problems that become related to embryonic donations that allow recipients of embryonic donors to get disease transmission to later generations. The application of ethics by nurses in ART is able to consider badly the event by exposing embryonic donors and recipients to establish communication in the future. The importance of applying ethics as a better way of preventing diseases arising after ART actions both for donors and donor recipients.


Alon, I., Guimon, J., & Urbanos-Garrido, R. (2019). Regulatory responses to assisted reproductive technology: a comparative analysis of Spain and Israel. J Assist Reprod Genet, 36(8), 1665-1681. doi:10.1007/s10815-019-01525-7

Bernard M Y Cheung, K. S. L. L. (2019). Evidence-based medicine and infertility treatment. Vol 393. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30200-4

De Geyter, C. (2019). Assisted reproductive technology: Impact on society and need for surveillance. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 33(1), 3-8. doi:10.1016/j.beem.2019.01.004

Dunietz, G. L., Holzman, C., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Todem, D., Boulet, S. L.,Diamond, M. P. (2017). Assisted reproductive and risk of preterm birth in singletons by infertility diagnoses and treatment modalities: a population-based study. J Assist Reprod Genet, 34(11), 1529-1535.doi:10.1007/s10815-017-1003-6

Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address, A. a. o., & Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive, M. (2016). Oocyte or embryo donation to women of advanced reproductive age: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril, 106(5), e3-e7. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.002

Ghuman,N.,& Ramalingam, M. (2018). Male infertility. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine, 28(1), 7-14.doi:10.1016 /j.ogrm.2017.10.007

Halliday, J., Lewis, S., Kennedy, J., Burgner, D. P., Juonala, M., Hammarberg, K., . . . McLachlan, R. (2019). Health of adults aged 22 to 35 years conceived by assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril, 112(1), 130-139. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.03.001

Jesus, A. R., Silva-Soares, S., Silva, J., Severo, M., Barros, A., & Doria, S. (2019). Reproductive success of assisted reproductive technology in couples with chromosomal abnormalities. J Assist Reprod Genet, 36(7), 1471-1479. doi:10.1007/s10815-019-01486-x

Meldrum, D. R. (2016). "Lightening the burden of care in assisted reproductive technology." Fertil Steril 105(5): 1144-1145

Messerlian, C., Platt, R. W., Tan, S. L., Gagnon, R., & Basso, O. (2015). Low-technology assisted reproduction and the risk of preterm birth in a hospital-based cohort. Fertil Steril, 103(1), 81-88 e82. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.006

Taebi, M., Bahrami, R., Bagheri-Lankarani, N., & Shahriari, M. (2018). Ethical Challenges of Embryo Donation in Embryo Donors and Recipients. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res, 23(1), 36-39. doi:10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_162_16

Vander Borght, M., & Wyns, C. (2018). Fertility and infertility: Definition and epidemiology. Clin Biochem, 62, -10.doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem. 2018.03.012

Yatsenko, S. A., & Rajkovic, A. (2019). Genetics of human female infertility. Biol Reprod. doi:10.1093/biolre/i